PUSMAS – Message For You (3)

QUOTE:

1.  “Sometimes we find ourselves walking through life blindfolded, and we try to deny that we’re the ones who securely tied the knot.”

2.  “No matter how busy you may think you are, you must find time for reading, or surrender yourself to self-chosen ignorance.”

===============================================

I have been asking myself of late: With so much time and resources available virtually at a flick of the finger, why are these people still fumbling around to get the facts right? Will they ever learn the all important art of self-correcting? Will they ever grow up and stop relying on others to pick up, rectify, and show them their mistakes?

“To err is human…..” so goes the saying. But then, there is another complementary saying that says “To keep on erring is devilish”. So, in all honesty, if we consider ourselves worthy to be in the company of the creature called human being, isn’t it our responsibility to learn from past mistakes and avoid repeating the same?

How to self-correct and avoid making the same mistakes of falling into the same crater over and over again?

Much as I would like to show the way, I have to acknowledge the fact that not all lessons can be taught, and I must also admit that some lessons have to be simply learned.  And let me say, without wavering, that being ignorant is not so much a shame, as being unwilling to learn.

So please start learning because it is never too late to learn.

B Langkawi 4

Can anyone see what’s wrong with the wordings (above) underlined in RED?

If you can’t, please take a long deep breath and look closely again. Still can’t make out?

Look again at the picture and read carefully the information associated with the ship…..the LST KD Raja Jarom.

(Just to recap briefly,  this blog, with the help of her ex crew – Jack Harris – had to a certain extent covered HERE among other things:

(The departure of the Project Team or Advance Party from Paya Lebar Airport, the towing of the two LSTs from their disposal yard at Vallejo, California, the refurbishing at the Triple A (AAA) Shipyard, Hunters Point, San Francisco, the removal of three 200-years old cannons from Pulau Aur, off Mersing and the collision with the Japanese Tanker, Shoyu Maru in the Straits of Singapore).

Now, let’s return to the main objective of this posting: to dissect and analyse where PUSMAS has erred.

Across the word  “Tauliah” or Commissioning is written 7 October 1976. Is that date correct, or wrong?

Next, click HERE and compare the events related to the date. According to Wikipedia, the aforesaid date is the date the LST was transferred to – and acquired by – the Royal Malaysian Navy.

Please note and understand that ‘Transfer’ and ‘Commissioning’ are two different things. They are, literally, light years apart.

Why trust Wikipedia? Who knows it could also be wrong!

If that is the argument, then let UPBB validate its claim via newspaper clipping (below) from the Straits Times dated 21 February 1977.

Comprehending the content of the report, and taking time zone into account, it can be safely deduced that KD Raja Jarom and KD Sri Banggi were commissioned in the United States on Saturday, 19 February 1977 and NOT 7 October 1976.  

Can PUSMAS prove that UPBB is wrong? If it can, please provide evidence to the contrary?

Bangi and Jarom-2

Next, we look at the sentences underlined in Red across the word “Nota” which says that: “Berkhidmat dalam Tentera Laut Diraja Malaysia secara pinjaman dari Tentera Laut Amerika Syarikat dan seterusnya ditauliahkan pada 1 Julai 1971…..”

What’s wrong with the “Nota”, and where are the mistakes, if there’s any?

Mistake number 1:  At first it says: “Tauliah – 7 Oktober 1976”, and then it contradicts itself by saying “ditauliahkan pada 1 Julai 1971”.

Mistake number 2:  The ship that was initially loaned by the US Navy is not USS Sedgwick County (KD Raja Jarom). The ship is USS Hunterdon County (KD Sri Langkawi), which sailed into the Straits of Johore and berthed for the first time at the Malaysian Base Jetty, Woodlands on 29 June 1971, and officially handed over to the RMN on Monday, 5 July 1971.

Mistake number 3:  The Commissioning of KD Sri Langkawi was on Saturday, 10 July 1971 and NOT 1 July 1971, and the Commissioning Warrant was read by the Commanding Officer, Commander Chong Gan Son.

NOTE:  Sequence of events before commissioning:

A.  29 June 1971 – USS Hunterdon County arrived at the MBJ.

B.  5 July 1971  - Handing over ceremony.  (Since it’s absurd to commission the ship while the name of USS Hunterdon County can still be seen on the superstructure and the Pennant Number 838 on her Port and Starboard bow, RMN had to remove the American identity and replace them with Malaysian identity - KD Sri Langkawi A1500. All the conversion had to be done by 9 July 1971).

C.  10 July 1971 – Commissioning.

Click HERE for the picture of  Doa Selamat held in conjunction with the Commissioning Ceremony at the MBJ.

And HERE for a brief discription and inside story of KD Sri Langkawi.

Langkawi-Hunterdon County

29 June 1971 – USS Hunterdon County, Pennant Number 838, was on her way to the Malaysian Base Jetty, Woodlands. The tall structure in the background is the Government Building, Bukit Timbalan, JB.

Should PUSMAS require proof pertaining to the Handing Over and Commissioning of KD Sri Langkawi, please refer to the  newspaper reports below.

Need I say more ?

a1

Posted in RMN - Craps Collections, RMN/TLDM | 9 Comments

KD Sri Tawau – July 1969

Following my posting “PUSMAS – Message For You (2)” in which UPBB disputed beyond doubt the caption “Pangkalan KD SRI TAWAU Tahun 1964”, Ex RO emailed me these two pictures dated 16 July 1969 – courtesy of 801553 CPOEM Ooi.

A picture paints a thousands, so they say.  With two pictures in hand, UPBB can then paint two thousand words. Yes or No? No, I don’t have the stomach to bullshit my way by writing long winded articles.

Suffice to say that the two pictures reminds me of the days gone by. Most of the Senior Ratings in the picture were still there when I arrived seven months after the two pictures were taken.

Those days, ratings drafted to East Malaysia can expect to serve a period ranging from 1 to 2 years. And if the CO/RNO likes them, the period can be further extended indifinitely (my good friend CPORM Mah ‘chai’ spent more than three years banging his balls in Sibu).

AT6

A picture not only paints a thousand words but can also bear witness as to the true meaning of Royal Malaysian Navy of the Sixties and part of the Seventies. What does it mean?

In the Sixties and early part of the Seventies, the British still had strong influnce in recruiting, training and promoting those considered worthy of the rank. Thereafter, when the number of British Seconded Personnel started to dwindle,  the exodus of the non-Malays began so much so to that the Royal Malaysian Navy from the late seventies onwards was but a mere shadow of what it was.

The 4 Officers of the base – KD Sri Tawau – in the picture below reflects correctly the racial composition of Malaysia back then.

CO/RNO:  Lieutenant Balagopal Pillai,

XO:  Lieutenant Yassin Salleh

BSO:  Sub Lieutenant Ooi Thian Sun

RCO:  Sub Lieutenant Syed Abu Bakar

And out of 16 Senior Ratings, 11 were Malays, 4 Chinese, and 1 Sikh.

And now, in the new millenium, how does the racial composition look like?

AT5

There are two Ooi(s) in the picture: one is a Sub Lieutenant from the Supply and Secretariat (S&S) Branch, and the other is a Petty Officer Electrical Mechanic (P.O.E.M.) from the Electrical Department.

Ooi the Officer….Best remembered by Junior Ratings whenever it was his turn to be on duty as Officer Of the Day (O.O.D.). This pint-sized officer’s strictness while conducting the 8pm inspection of accomodation blocks is legendary.  If the dorm or toilet falls below his expectation, be ready for re-inspection.

But, strict as he was, he will not go out of his way to go after ratings who opted to stay out of the Dorm during the inspection.

Ooi the Electrician…..The first thing he did in the morning was to wipe off the dew from his car with a towel and a bucket of water. The car – Mitsubishi Colt Gallant – was bought in Labuan and transported back to Woodlands via KD Sri Langkawi A1500.

Wonder whether Ooi the Electrician still speaks like a staccato rhythm, or has slowed down with age!

Posted in RMN/TLDM, Sri Tawau (KD) | 3 Comments

Confession of a “Teach For Malaysia” teacher ?

From the Facebook of Alina Amir:

After 4 months into teaching, I came back from a class this morning, put my books on my desk, coolly walked to the ladies, and broke down; with tears, sobs, frantically fanned myself with my hands thinking that could help calm me down, the whole enchilada. Something I have not done for a very long time.

In the last four months, I could have cried when I had kids calling me a prostitute in mandarin, or that time when a kid told me I should not mess with him because his dad is part of the notorious along gangster crew (which I have never heard of and the phrase “ignorance is bliss” could not have rung truer), or that time when I was wolf-whistled at for weeks wherever I went, or when a disruptive boy decided to get up in the middle of my lesson, ran around the room and banged every table before he ran out of the class despite me calling after him and then having him come back and literally went on the floor, hugging my feet and begged for my forgiveness the same day, or when I was locked in the school building and then had to come out through the roof (long story) or when a big fat rat, literally, decided to chill right in front of my front door. Those were legit reasons to cry if I wanted to cry. But I didn’t. Not a single tear rolled down my cheeks. I stood up to my boys, I had sleepless nights thinking of strategies to get my kids to just sit down for a single lesson, told every kid who threatened me to bring it on, went to every boy who wolf-whistled and threw inappropriate remarks at me, looked them straight in the eyes and said, “how dare you”. I have got nothing to lose and I am sure, as hell is not scared of anybody, no matter who your daddy is.

This morning however, was different. In fact, I wasn’t teaching at all this morning. I was in a form 4 class, of which I only teach PJK to the six of the girls every week. So what was I doing with the entire class?

I was invigilating their mid year exam, Sejarah Kertas 3 to be exact; An open book test where students are required to write an essay on a topic given. Just as I finished handing out the exam papers to all 35 students, one boy put his hand up and asked, “ujian apa hari ni, cikgu?” and I went, “HOW CAN YOU NOT KNOW WHAT PAPER YOU ARE SITTING FOR ON THE DAY OF THE EXAM AND EVEN AFTER I HAVE HANDED OUT THE EXAM PAPER” silently in my head. Out loud, I said, “ujian Sejarah, kertas 3. Ujian ni boleh tengok buku, so keluarkan lah buku”.

Half of the classroom started to rummage through their bags and looked under their tables for books while the other half put their heads down and went to sleep. Ten minutes into the exam, they were all just staring at their books, opened to the first page. I went to a boy and asked if he knew what he was supposed to do. He shook his head and continued staring at his book. Another boy looked at me pleadingly, and asked, “cikgu, macam mana nak buat ni?” No one was writing anything. No one.

I went to one of the girls and asked her to read the question and then looked for the answer in the book. The first question she asked after I told her that was, “bab berapa tu?” and I could sense the whole class was waiting for me to tell her which chapter to open to. I knew then, that they have never read a single thing from their textbook nor have they learned anything in the past four months of school. Heck, I wouldn’t be going too far if I said they barely learned anything in the last 10 years of school. At that moment, I saw their future flashed through my eyes and I wanted to cry.

I wanted to cry because it was unfair for them to be sitting for an exam that they are clearly not ready for. I wanted to cry because someone allowed this to happen. I wanted to cry because as I was explaining to some of the students on how to do the exam and they were eagerly listening, while I was quietly panicking because I am no way near being a Sejarah Form 4 teacher. I wanted to cry because I felt incompetent, wishing I remembered what I learned back in From 4 so that I can teach them something at that moment. I wanted to cry because it is not their fault. But most of all, I wanted to cry because I have 200 students and I have classes back to back from 7.30 AM up to 10.00PM every day that it would be completely impossible to take on new students. All I could think of was how if only all the educated people in the country would spend their time teaching these kids, then maybe, maybe I’d be writing a different story.

I have never actually done this before; asking people to consider teaching. I believe that entering into the profession should come out of your own will. I have never recommended “Teach For Malaysia” to anyone. In fact, I’d be all-skeptical to anyone who are actually considering to join TFM. What are you in for? To have connections with top corporate partners? To meet CEOs of this and that? To be featured in newspapers, radio, magazines, online blogs?

What are you in for?

Is it the tagline? Is it really for the kids? I’ve been asked these questions before and I personally used to think that it was a fair concern. It needs to be out there that being a teacher, through TFM or not, is not even a tad bit glamorous. You don’t get paid on time, you’d be missing best friends’ weddings, family gatherings, birthdays etc., you have crazy deadlines and you’ll feel like crap because you don’t know how you’re doing. Nobody sends you a “good job” email on that awesome class you just had, or though you had.

Are you sure you want to be a teacher?

If you think it is a walk in the park, be rest assured that it’ll be the ghettoest, most-messed-up park you have ever walked in. I used to think that only the strong should be a teacher. Only those who know that they won’t quit should be a teacher.

Today, I don’t care anymore. Today, I realized how desperate the country is and ‘beggars’ can’t be choosers. If you have gone through the education system and came out alive, teach. If you have no idea what to teach, trust me you’ll learn. You’d be surprised to meet kids who have never been told that cleanliness is a virtue, that ‘rempit’ is not a legit career path, that you don’t have to give up at 16.

Listen to me, drop everything you’re doing and come back to school. Teach them to be human beings because they need to know that screaming at a lady is not the way to speak, that not knowing how to read at 13 is not cool, that cursing at your teachers is rude and to talk back to your mother in front of everybody at school would get you to every hell of every single religion in the world. Teach. If you think it’s too hard and teaching isn’t your thing, then quit. But you can’t quit teaching if you have not actually tried teaching. My point is, every one should teach. Decide later if it is something you want to do in the long run. Just teach. Join TFM, do it the normal route, stop a kid in the middle of the road and ask him/her to tell you the multiplication table, tell him/her a random fact about Egypt or aeroplanes, teach them the right intonation after seeing a question mark, teach.

If you think, all this doesn’t make sense and it’s just some really long facebook status/note by a crazy lady who just cried in a high school toilet, then darling, my dear, you have not taught in a classroom where half of them can barely read and write and the other half is just lost by this immense language barrier that no logical inspiring words can get through them.

So teach. I am on my facebook knees.

ADMIN’S NOTE:

The above article (confession) reveals the dark side of our education system – the widening gap between The Good, The Bad and The Ugly students.

It reminds me of someone who barely passed SPM (with scattering B’s and C’s and not a single A) but  was accepted to pursue Diploma/Degree in education at a local IPTS…..and is now  a ‘Cikgu’ at a primary school in Selangor.

Will the students under the guidance/tutelage of this ‘Cikgu’ be smarter, or will they be worse than the ‘Sifu’?

Posted in ENGLISH, reflections (general) | 6 Comments

PUSMAS – Message For You (2)

Prologue:

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

Should those concerned feel slighted by the revelation, I have nothing but apologies for presenting these serialised ‘Damage Control’ lessons.

KD Sri Tawau 2A

What does the words underlined in red (above) reveal?

1962 hingga 1966 – Confrontation did not start in 1962, but 1963 (why repeat RMN’s previous mistake that says Confrontation started in 1964?…HERE).

For General Knowledge, Soekarno issued the infamous edict “GANYANG MALAYSIA” upon realising that his effort to thwart the formation of Malaysia has failed.

And, should I be given the task of writing about the early history of KD Sri Tawau, instead of beating around the bush dwelling on events (incorrectly) preceeding the formation of Malaysia which most of us already know, I would write it this way:

SEJARAH AWAL

Sejarah awal KD Sri Tawau bermula pada bulan Ogos 1963 apabila RMN yang pada masa itu masih dikenali sebagai Royal Malayan Navy menghantar 10 orang Junior Ratings bertugas di Tawau, Borneo Utara. Kelompok perintis ini dianggotai oleh Leading Seaman Tawab, Able Seaman (ABSM) Ali Marinam, Hamidon, Mazlan, Osman ‘patah’, Salih, Able Rating Engineering Mechanic (ABME) Clitus Gomez dan Yusuf Wok serta Able Rating Radio Operator (ABRO) Yaakob dan Yazid. Sementara menunggu ketibaan pegawai RMN, mereka melapor diri kepada Lt Paul Schumaitser dari Royal Navy.

Mereka ditempatkan bersama unit infantri dari The Gordon Highlanders, British Army dan mendirikan khemah di tapak kilang papan Teck Guan Sawmill yang pada masa itu terletak di tepi pantai sebelah belakang Hospital Tawau. Mereka ditugaskan mengendali dua buah bot dari jenis HLD, singkatan untuk Harbour Launch Diesel.

Setelah beberapa minggu bertugas di bawah pegawai dari Royal Navy, dua orang pegawai anak tempatan yang diserap dari Royal Malaysian Navy Volunteer Reserve (RMNVR) cawangan Pulau Pinang – Sub Lt Thyagarajah dan Sub Lt Zainal Arabi – tiba di Tawau untuk memulakan tugas sebagai CO dan XO/RCO pertama pangkalan Royal Malaysian Navy yang belum bernama.  

Dengan kehadiran 10 orang Junior Ratings sebagai perintis, dan disusuli dengan ketibaan 2 orang pegawai RMNVR, maka lahirlah sebuah ‘makeshift base-camp’ yang kemudiannya dinamakan KD Sri Tawau.

NOTE:

Should PUSMAS require additional information/inside story of the early days of KD Sri Tawau, kindly log on to: 10 Budak Hitam – Tawau 1963.

The above ‘rambling’ is about the formation or the early days of what is now known as KD Sri Tawau.

KD Sri Tawau 4

Pangkalan KD SRI TAWAU Tahun 1964

The above picture is downloaded from PUSMAS Website.

Oh my God, please have pity on me. How much more can I withstand such blatant disregard for facts. The picture and its caption “Pangkalan KD SRI TAWAU Tahun 1964” defies logic.

Inevitably, doubts begin to creep into my mind…..are these people really serious in discharging their duties! Haven’t they got the time to surf the internet, or the know-how to extract relevant information from the following picture-postings: HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE, HEREHERE, HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE, and HERE.

Presuming that they have opened the above links, can those people entrusted to gather historical facts put two and two together and come up with an answer?

Or do they still have to rely on this ‘old salt’ to provide a microscopic analysis and explain in detail what to make-out from the pictures/notes that were posted ‘eons’ ago in UPBB?

If that is so, I’ll say it loud and clear that the caption for the picture “Pangkalan KD SRI TAWAU Tahun 1964” is incorrect – 100%.

How sure I am?

Very sure. I was drafted to KD Sri Tawau on 15 February 1970 and drafted out on 15 March the following year.

Can I substantiate my stance?

Since I am still in the mood of talking sense, I will identify the objects that I have marked on that picture, and from there the person responsible for posting it can make his own conclusion.

1.  Workshop for Electrical, Radio, Engineering and Shipwright

2.  Store – with asbestos roofing and zinc wall

3.  LCP (Landing Craft Personnel) on the slip

4.  Senior Rates (bachelor) Accomodation Unit/Mess

5.  Commanding Officer’s Quarters

6.  Administration Block cum XO, RCO and BSO’s Quarters

7.  Junior Rates Canteen

8.  Slipway

9.  Junior Rates Accomodation Block

10.  Tawau Base Jetty

Except for one small single story structure on the extreme left side of the picture (Guard House), the rest of the unmarked structures were not there ‘yet’ (as of March 1971).

So, what’s my calculated guess?

The picture was taken after 1972, and indisputably NOT 1964.

Posted in RMN - Craps Collections, RMN/TLDM | 3 Comments

PUSMAS – Message For You (1)

On 18 December 2012, Captain ‘Unggeh’ wrote in the comment section of UPBB, and part of what was written is pasted below:

Dear UPBB,
Izinkan saya ucapkan terima kasih serta tahniah di atas pengorbanan tuan membetulkan fakta yang salah dalam artikel secara sukarela.  Walau bagaimanapun kami yang masih berkhidmat tentu sekali mengambil tindakan sewajarnya membetulkan fakta-fakta tersebut dan juga akan menyebarkan nya dalam website PUSMAS TLDM melalui navy.mil.my mulai tahun hadapan…”

Captain ‘Unggeh’ Sir,

Congratulations to you in particular, and your staff in general for turning into reality what once seemed like a distant dream – a dream hatched, perhaps on the same day PUSMAS was conceived.

In time to come, and with dedicated Officer like you at the helm, I have no doubt that PUSMAS will get better. Rest assured, when the time comes to say Goodbye, you can look back with pride, knowing that your perseverance has, in no small way contributed to the making of PUSMAS (Website) an official source of reference, if not for the world, but for Malaysian History Lovers nonetheless.

Meanwhile, UPBB would like to bring to your attention an obvious mistake pertaining to the weaponry of KD Rahmat that appears in PUSMAS Website. Incidentally, from 1/9/75 to 20/12/76, I was the CPORM of the ship (frigate) in question, and it was also my last ship before ending a 13-year ‘love affair’ with the RMN Woodlands.

And hence, the memory still lingers more so after visiting her in Lumut last year - nearly 36 years after stepping out of her gangway in December 1976.

A Rahmat 22

The above, showing the mistake is extracted from HERE.

On seeing that ‘very obvious mistake’, my initial reaction was to respond via the comment section, and in PUSMAS Website it is called ‘MAKLUM BALAS’. But, upon surfing the said section, I was disappointed to learn that particular part of ‘PUSMAS Website’ is merely a breeding ground for Junk Electronic Messages known as SPAM…..HERE.

QUESTION: Why allow SPAM to infiltrate the PUSMAS Website? Is it caused by the failure of its SPAM Filter? If so, why can’t the administrator clear the SPAM as and when necessary?

On second thought, could the release of SPAM as COMMENTS be due to the poor understanding of English Language, and hence the inability to separate legitimate comments from SPAM?  Or because of ‘tidak apa’ attitude?

Having said all that, let me return to the essence of this posting. To start with let us examine the picture of KD Rahmat which, if my memory still serves me right, I have already posted in this blog albeit with dissimilar markings and purpose.

A Rahmat 4A

Original Surface and Air Weaponry of KD Rahmat

A:  Quadruple SEACAT Launcher (Pelancar SEACAT kembar 4)

B: M44 Radar which controls the SEACAT close range Surface to Air guided Missile system (SAM)

C:  LW02 Long Range Air Search Radar/Antenna

D:  Starboard Bofors 40/70, and a similar gun on the Port Side

E:  M22 Gunnery Radar which controls the 4.5″ Gun

F:  4.5″ Gun Mark Vlll

A Rahmat 5A

4.5″ Gun Turret of KD Rahmat – picture taken in July 2012

A Rahmat 6A

It was here that (Port) Bofors 40/70 was mounted - picture taken in July 2012

FOOTNOTE:

There has never been any doubt that RMN Woodlands has a special place in our hearts – the deep nostalgia and enduring affection has never been more so significant than the bittersweet memories of serving in obsolete small craft of yesteryear – before, during and after the Indonesian Confrontation.

Posted in RMN Reflections (English), RMN/TLDM | 11 Comments

Cerita Kereta 17 – Myvi Servis 40,000 km

Komen 1 :  Angahnya kereta aku myvi dah 40k km .. .Apa yg perlu ditukar leh

Komen 2 :  Gasket drain plug n battery tminal protecter perlu tukar slalu ker? Apasal benda ni xda pun dlm manual pengguna.. ni mesti kes nak mnipu ni… alahai terkena jugak la ni.

Komen 3:  nak tnya skit..saya baru keluar Myvi jumaat lepas di perodua keramat kuala lumpur..& start sabtu haritu dah ke kedah – bandar baharu trus ke batu kurau & pusing2 taiping, next day ahad, saya trus ke perlis (padang besar – alor setar) stay alor setar smpai isnin than trun balik bandar baharu. selasa ulang alik bandar baharu ke Bukit mertajam 2x than balik semula ke KL. tgh odometer last 1061 tp itu kat penang lagi. kemungkinan dah 15xx.. so nak mintak advise la..siapa tau area KL yang pusat servisenye leh diklasifikasikan honest??thanks.

Komen 4:  adoi, teruknya sy kna tpu hri ni. Bru blk servis keta myvi se 1.5 utk kali ke 4, kena paw smpai rm421. Tukar gasket, engine oil, break oil, coolant, labour of break bleeding, air filter n ntah apa2 lg la.. Btol2 ase tertipu, myesl sgt2, rm400++ terbang g2 je hjung2 bln ni. Tpksa servis sbb nk jaln jauh lusa. Huhuhu pokai poket kos0ng skg.

==================================================

Empat komen (pertanyaan) di atas dipetik dari posting bertajuk “Cerita kereta 12 – Myvi Servis” di mana admin tak berkesempatan untuk menjawab satu persatu.

Walaupun pada zahirnya posting ini dikhususkan untuk Servis 40,000 km, namun dengan penjelasan dan carta yang dimuat-naik di bawah ini, diharap pelayar UPBB akan dapat memahami apa yang wajib ditukar untuk jarak sebelum dan selepas 40,000km seperti yang dikehendaki oleh pengeluar kereta. Dan BUKAN seperti yang disaran-paksa oleh PUSAT SERVIS.

Kenapa dikhususkan untuk 40,000 km Myvi Servis sahaja?

Pertama: Kebetulan, kereta Myvi anak admin yang dibelinya 18 bulan yang lalu sudah hampir mencecah angka tersebut. Kalau mengikut carta senggaraan Perodua Servis, dia kena sediakan duit sekitar RM400 (empat ratus).

Kedua: Mengikut carta Perodua Servis, senggaraan 20,000 km, 40,000 km, 60,000 km, 80,000 km, 100,000 km  merupakan ‘Major Service’. Saranan (atau lebih tepat lagi kalau disebut ‘paksaan’) pusat servis bertentangan dengan panduan yang diberikan oleh pengeluar kenderaan.

Ketiga: WARRANTY (jaminan) untuk setiap kenderaan yang dikeluarkan oleh Perodua ditanggung oleh pengeluar (manufacturer) dan BUKAN pusat servis. Oleh itu, untuk mempastikan agar warranty untuk kenderaan anda tidak terbatal (null and void), anda hanya perlu membuat senggaraan seperti yang dikehendaki oleh pengeluar dan BUKAN pusat servis.

a1

Ab1

Ab2

Ab3

Carta yang di scan dari buku Owner’s Manual Myvi model terkini

Perhati dan fahamkan apa yang wajib ditukar untuk servis 40,000km seperti yang disaran oleh pengeluar kenderaan (Perodua).

Untuk memudahkan pembaca yang melayari blog ini memahaminya, sila ambil perhatian terhadap TITIK HITAM dalam kotak WARNA BIRU…..kerana itulah sahaja yang wajib ditukar untuk servis 40,000km.

Perhati dan fahamkan juga perkataan dalam kotak melintang WARNA MERAH. Brake Fluid (minyak brek) dan Coolant wajib ditukar setiap DUA TAHUN dan BUKAN setiap 20,000km seperti yang disaran-paksa oleh pusat servis.

Berapa jumlah duit yang perlu disediakan oleh anak admin untuk servis 40,000km?

Berpandukan kos alat ganti dan upah yang ditetapkan oleh Perodua Servis untuk kereta dengan Automatic Transmission, dia hanya perlu menyediakan duit sebanyak RM263.90 (Jumlah upah RM248.95 x 6% cukai) dan BUKAN RM410.90!

Kenapa admin sebut RM410.90 dan bukan 393.65 seperti yang tercatit dalam Carta Perodua Servis yang admin muat-naik di bawah ini?

Pelik kan? Macamlah admin ni terror sangat Arithmetic sehingga boleh mempertikai kebolehan si cerdik pandai di Perodua Servis membuat kira-kira (calculation).

Nak tau di mana kesilapan (kecuaian) mereka?

Perhatikan peratusan cukai yang perlu dibayar yang tertera di baris paling bawah carta servis yang admin muat-naik di bawah ini – Tax 6%.

Jumlah kos alat ganti dan upah adalah sebanyak RM387.65. Kalau cukai yang dikenakan ialah 6%, macamana 6% dari RM387.65 = RM6.00!

Jumlah sebenar cukai 6% ke atas RM387.65 ialah RM23.25.

Atau mungkin juga kesilapan itu disengajakan untuk menunjukkan bahawa jumlah atas kertas yang perlu dibayar adalah kurang dari RM400.00 sedangkan bila kereta sudah siap diservis, pemiliknya kena bayar RM410.90 atau lebih. (Dalam komen nombor 4 di atas, pemilik kenderaan kena ‘ketuk’ sehingga RM421.00)

SOALAN:

1.  Bila spark plug harus diganti? Kenapa tak diganti setiap 10,00km seperti yang disaran-paksa oleh pusat servis, atau diganti pada servis 40,000km?

Berdasarkan pengalaman admin yang sudah 40 tahun membuat servis sendiri (setelah tamat tempoh jaminan), sekiranya injin tidak bermasalah, spark plug masih dalam keadaan baik walaupun sudah digunakan untuk 50,00km atau lebih. Namun, to be on the safe side, admin tukar setiap 50,000km.

2.  Perlukah ditukar Drain Plug Gasket dan Battery Terminal Protector setiap kali kenderaan di servis?

Pemilik kenderaan tak ada pilihan dan terpaksa mengikut saranan pusat servis untuk menukar Drain Plug Gasket kerana sekiranya tidak ditukar, dan kalau ada kebocoran minyak injin di drain outlet, pusat servis akan menyalahkan pemilik kenderaan. Manakala penukaran Battery Terminal Protector adalah satu pembaziran. Akan admin perincikan maksud ‘pembaziran’ dalam posting akan datang.

3.  Apa yang wajib ditukar untuk 40,000km dan setiap 40,000km selepas itu?

Untuk memudahkan pemilik kenderaan, admin letakkan tanda Asterisk ( ** ) dalam carta perodua servis di bawah ini.

Semoga pembaca faham dan lebih berpengetahuan selepas membaca posting ini.

ab4

Posted in kereta & DIY, MALAY | 1 Comment

Jasa tak dikenang

Kisah Suka Duka dan Pengorbana Pakar Bedah Kulit Hitam – Dr Hamilton Naki.

a1

Walaupun Hamilton Naki memakai topi dan surgical mask, tapi dia tak pernah belajar secara formal ilmu perubatan dan pembedahan. Dia berhenti sekolah semasa berusia 14 tahun, dan menjadi tukang kebun di salah sebuah sekolah perubatan di Cape Town

a2

Tahun 1967, sedang dunia meraikan kejayaan pertama pemindahan jantung oleh Dr Christiaan Barnard, kita tidak dimaklumkan tentang penglibatan ‘Dr’ Hamilton Naki – pakar bedah yang bertanggungjawab mengeluarkan jantung dari tubuh seorang penderma wanita.

Jantung itu kemudiannya dipindahkan (transplanted) ke tubuh Louis Washkanky.

Hamilton Naki adalah doktor bedah kedua terpenting dalam pembedahan ulung tersebut. Namun, disebabkan warna kulit dan dasar apartheid Afrika Selatan, kebolehan dan kepakarannya tidak ditonjolkan.

a3

Dr Christiaan Barnard, ketua pakar bedah kulit putih menjadi celeberiti yang terkenal seluruh dunia.

a4

Walaupun Hamilton Naki merupakan orang kedua terpenting dalam pasukan tersebut, namun dia tidak dibenarkan muncul dalam gambar. Sekiranya tanpa disengajakan wajahnya terselit antara wajah-wajah mereka berkulit putih, pihak hospital akan menamakan dia sebagai anggota perkhidmatan pencuci hospital (Hospital Cleaning Staff).

a5

Kerjaya kedotoran Hamilton Naki bermula semasa bertugas sebagai tukang cuci di bilik-bilik kuliah. Disitulah dia belajar teknik pembedahan dengan memerhatikan doktor-doktor kulit putih membuat pemindahan organ (organ transplant) ke atas anjing dan khinzir.

a7

Berbekalkan kegigihan dan kebolehan semula jadi, akhirnya Hamilton Naki menjadi pakar bedah luar biasa. Dr Barnard melantiknya sebagai salah seorang pakar bedah dalam pasukan.

a8

Di Afrika Selatan waktu itu, mereka yang berkulit hitam tidak dibenarkan membuat pembedahan ke atas pesakit kulit putih, atau menyentuh darah mereka.

Tapi, memandangkan kebolehan luar biasa Hamilton Naki, pihak hospital membuat pengecualian dan melantiknya sebagai pakar bedah…..secara rahsia.

Perlantikan tersebut tidak sedikit pun mengubah sikap Hamilton Naki. Dasar apartheid (diskriminasi kaum) yang diamalkan oleh pemerintah tidak menghalang beliau untuk meneruskan usaha menimba ilmu dan memberikan yang terbaik.

a9

Walaupun diberikan tugas mengajar penuntut perubatan kulit putih, tapi dia hanya layak menerima gaji seorang Teknisyen Makmal (Lab Technician) – bayaran tertinggi yang dapat diberikan oleh pihak hospital kepada pekerja kulit hitam.

a10

Dan…..sebagai pakar bedah, dia hanya layak menghuni pondok tanpa kemudahan bekalan air paip dan elektrik.

a11

Selama 40 tahun Hamilton Naki menurunkan ilmu perubatan/pembedahan. Namun, setelah bersara dia hanya layak menerima pencen sebagai tukang kebun dengan bayaran sebanyak $275 sebulan.

a13

Disebalik sikap ketidakadilan pemerintah dan masyarakat kulit putih, Hamilton Naki tetap gigih berusaha dan memberikan khidmat terbaik dalam bidang yang amat dicintainya - membantu menyelamatkan nyawa.

Dengan berakhirnya dasar apartheid, dan sebagai mengenang jasanya, Hamilton Naki diberi anugerah dan gelaran Doktor Kehormat (Honoris Causa)

a001

Mei 2005, Dr Hamilton Naki, rakyat Afrika Selatan kulit hitam meninggal dunia dalam usia 78 tahun.

Berita kematiannya tidak mendapat tempat di akhbar walaupun perjalanan hidupnya merupakan salah sebuah cerita luar biasa abad 20.

Sesungguhnya, Hamilton Naki bukan sahaja seorang pakar bedah yang hebat tapi seorang lagenda ‘kulit hitam’ yang hidup subur dikalangan bangsanya.

Posted in cuit & cubit, MALAY | 3 Comments